WebMCP Readiness updates annotations for static discovery
The project updates annotations used to discover features through static analysis.
WebMCP Readiness is a diagnostic tool that checks whether a website is prepared for searches and agents. It looks at technical and editorial signals related to WebMCP, SEO, GEO, and AEO. The analysis is passive: no tool on the website is run.
For people who manage a website, the scan gathers evidence, shows four scores, and points out blockers, alerts, and prioritized fixes. It also suggests related courses and the next scanners in Formação WebMCP. The result considers only signals that can be observed during that scan; it is not a security certification.
To get started, enter the website’s public URL. It must use HTTP or HTTPS and open without authentication. The scan checks the page and public files such as robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and llms.txt. It does not crawl every page or verify ranking, backend security, or controlled execution by agents. The report can be downloaded as JSON.
The link opens the original content; some require a subscription.
Go further on INEMA.CLUB
More news
- 02/10Raio-X de Margem helps clinics and salons track losses and goalsThe dashboard compares results before and after, and tracks losses, targets, and attributable bonuses in a pilot with 1,302 clinics and salons in Batel.
- 01/10OpenAI Dots: analysis, criticism, and comparison with other toolsAn analysis explains what OpenAI Dots is, compares it with Muse, Grokbot, and Hermes, and gathers reported criticism and issues.
- 29/09San Martín — new visual concept and homepage in three languagesA new desk-style visual concept with sticky notes and folders, plus a homepage available in Portuguese, English, and Spanish.
- 29/09Codex + Claude in a video: how each one plans and reviewsA video presents the six levels of Use Both and explains each tool’s role, while also showing open courses and kits.
- 28/09Trade com Agentes: a 7-day study with GPT-6 AstraA study presents routines, task handoffs, and strategy with GPT-6 Astra, and explains why the result fell short of the S&P; it is not a recommendation.